Search for: "IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER" Results 1 - 20 of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 11:37 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
And so, if you’re required to testify in court, or if you’re compelled to produce sensitive documents, we’re here to help. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Kitzhaber timely appealed.In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Russell Knight
My office just uses the Cook County general Subpoena In A Civil Matter form. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:00 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Quinta Jurecic
So the court’s ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena is effectively the first peek at a very secret case. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Now imagine you’re the government, and you want to collect the suspect’s evidence. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 9:58 am by Bona Law PC
Employees should not talk to each other about the subpoena or the underlying subject matter. [read post]
Regrettably, the individuals receiving subpoenas today have refused and we’re forced to take this step to help ensure the committee uncovers facts concerning January 6th. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:34 pm by Rick Hasen
Trump’s efforts to cling to his office after he lost his bid for re-election, a person familiar with the matter said… Continue reading The post “Pence Gets Subpoena From Special Counsel in Jan. 6 Investigation” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The subpoena should be as narrowly drawn as possible; it should be directed at relevant information regarding a limited subject matter and should cover a reasonably limited time period. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Knoll, 2016 IL App (1st) 152494, ¶ 50, 65 N.E.3d 878 If the subpoena receiver has the documents, the only defense to not producing those documents is to claim that the documents are privileged communication. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
But the Supreme Court rejected those concerns, at least as a categorical matter, in Clinton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Jeff Vail
 In re Marriage of Wiggins, 279 P.3d 1 (Colo. 2012).It is common practice in Colorado to serve a subpoena duces tecum requesting production of documents at a deposition, but to cancel the deposition when the party produces the documents in advance. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The problem is that even as he claimed executive privilege to avoid answering any of the House committee’s questions, he was publishing a book and giving interviews on the very subject matter of the subpoenas. [read post]